On May 29, 2026, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) announced that it was launching an investigation of Vietnam under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.    The investigation will seek to determine “whether Vietnam’s persistent failure to resolve long-standing concerns about intellectual property (IP) protection and enforcement is unreasonable or discriminatory and burdens or restricts U.S. commerce.”  U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated, “While Vietnam has recently taken some steps toward addressing IP concerns that the United States has chronicled over many years in USTR’s Annual Special 301 Report, IP infringement in Vietnam continues to impair the competitive position of U.S. innovators and creators,” See USTR’s 2026 Special 301 Report for more details.

Under Section 301, actionable matters include acts, policies, and practices of a foreign country that are unreasonable or discriminatory and burden or restrict U.S. commerce. The Federal Register notice announcing this Section 301 investigation indicates that Vietnam since at least 2020 has “failed to make meaningful progress” on these IP issues in bilateral engagement, including in recent negotiations for an Agreement on Reciprocal, Fair, and Balanced Trade. See Thompson Hine Update of October 28, 2025

Investigation Timeline

Upon initiation of an investigation, the USTR must first seek consultations with the countries or trade partners subject to the investigations. The USTR must also seek public comment and hold a hearing on the matter. Below is the current schedule:

  • April 30, 2026: The USTR identified Vietnam as a priority foreign country in the 2026 Special 301 Report.
  • May 29, 2026: USTR opened the docket for submission of written comments.
  • July 2, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. EDT: To be assured of consideration, submit written comments by this date.

Interested parties should submit documents in response to this notice, including written comments, through the online USTR portal: https://comments.ustr.gov/s/ on Docket No. USTR-2026-0364.  The Federal Register notice does not indicate whether a public hearing on this investigation will be held.

Request for Public Comments

Interested parties are invited to submit written comments on any issue covered by the investigation. The USTR particularly requests comments regarding:

  • The following acts, policies, and practices of Vietnam:
    1. the failure to provide persistent and effective enforcement to combat online piracy.
    2. the failure to provide sufficient enforcement against widespread counterfeiting.
    3. the lack of effective border enforcement, including failure to utilize ex officio authority for IP seizures and lack of ex officio authority over in-transit goods.
    4. the lack of enforcement actions against unlicensed software use.
    5. the lack of criminal measures against cable and satellite signal theft.
  • Information on other acts, policies, and practices of Vietnam related to the denial of adequate and effective protection of IP rights and the denial of fair and equitable market access to persons that rely on IP protection.
  • Whether the acts, policies, and practices of Vietnam are unreasonable or discriminatory.
  • Whether the acts, policies, and practices of Vietnam burden or restrict U.S. commerce, and if so, the nature and level of burden or restriction on U.S. commerce.
  • Whether the acts, policies, and practices of Vietnam are actionable under section 301(b) of the Trade Act, and what action, if any, should be taken, including tariff and non-tariff actions.
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Scott E. Diamond** Scott E. Diamond**

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor…

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor compliance, corporate anti-boycott and antibribery compliance, national security investigations, and foreign direct investment in the United States.

**Not licensed to practice law.

Photo of David M. Schwartz David M. Schwartz

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping…

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping (AD), countervailing duty (CVD) and safeguard litigation, international trade policy, and cross-border compliance issues affecting goods, services, technology and investments that involve transportation, customs, export controls, economic sanctions, anti-boycott and anti-bribery laws and regulations.

Photo of Samir D. Varma Samir D. Varma

Samir advises multinational corporations on export controls, economic sanctions and customs, and counsels individuals and corporations on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other anti-corruption laws. He represents clients in enforcement actions before U.S. regulatory agencies and conducts corporate internal investigations.

Photo of Francesca M.S. Guerrero Francesca M.S. Guerrero

Francesca counsels clients on compliance with export controls, sanctions, import regulations, human rights and forced labor, and the FCPA and antibribery laws. She works closely with companies to develop tailored compliance programs that fit their specific needs, and routinely advises clients on some…

Francesca counsels clients on compliance with export controls, sanctions, import regulations, human rights and forced labor, and the FCPA and antibribery laws. She works closely with companies to develop tailored compliance programs that fit their specific needs, and routinely advises clients on some of their most challenging international transactions, involving dealings in high-risk jurisdictions or with high-risk counterparties. Francesca also counsels companies through all phases of internal investigations of potential trade and antibribery violations and represents companies across industries before related government agencies.