On April 4, 2024, the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) released another Interim Final Rule (IFR) offering clarification and correcting inadvertent errors made in earlier rulemakings regarding the implementation of significant export controls on certain advanced computing items and supercomputer and semiconductor end use. This latest rule is effective April 4, 2024.

Background

On October 7, 2022, IFR titled “Implementation of Additional Export Controls: Certain Advanced Computing and Semiconductor Manufacturing Items; Supercomputer and Semiconductor End Use; Entity List Modification,” made critical changes to the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–774) (EAR) in two areas to address U.S. national security concerns. Among its numerous provisions, the Rule restricted exports to China of high-end chips and semiconductor manufacturing equipment, including foreign made items that are the product of U.S. technology. It also restricted the export of a wide range of items that would support certain supercomputing or integrated circuit production end-uses in China. For additional details, see Thompson Hine Update of October 31, 2022.

On October 25, 2023, BIS published two IFRs updating the October 7, 2022 rulemaking that notably: (1) revised export controls on semiconductor manufacturing items by removing certain Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCNs) and revising license requirements; and (2) placing additional export controls on certain advanced computing items.

April 2024 Interim Final Rule

The latest April 4, 2024 IFR corrects inadvertent errors contained in the earlier rules and continues to make additional updates and clarifications. While numerous technical corrections and clarifications are addressed in this rulemaking, the most notable updates are:

  • Revisions to § 740.8 Notified Advanced Computing (NAC) and Advanced Computing Authorized (ACA) that make these separate licenses exceptions. Among other things, the NAC license exception will authorize exports and reexports of specified items to Macau and destinations in Country Group D:5 and entities headquartered in, or with an ultimate parent headquartered in, Macau or a destination specified in Country Group D:5, wherever located, that require a notification to BIS. The ACA license exception will authorize exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) of specified items to destinations in Country Group D:1 or D:4 (except Macau and destinations specified in Country Group D:5) that do not require a notification to BIS. License Exception ACA will also authorize transfers (in-country) to Macau and destinations in Country Group D:5, and entities headquartered in, or with an ultimate parent headquartered in, Macau or a destination specified in Country Group D:5, that do not require a notification to BIS.
  • Revisions to § 744.6.  Restrictions on specific activities of “U.S. persons” in which BIS’ license review standards have been clarified and modified.
  • Restoring controls for ECCNs that contain .z paragraphs. The IFR restores controls in the license requirement table of ECCNs 3A001, 3D001, 3E001, 4A003, 4A004, 4A005, 4D001, 4E001, 5A002, 5A004, 5D002, and 5E002, by removing the exceptions for .z paragraphs from the national security (NS), missile technology, nuclear proliferation, and/or crime control license requirement paragraphs. BIS notes that it is making these changes “to ensure the .z paragraphs will not be used to circumvent regime controls under the respective .z ECCNs (for instance, by inserting a chip to make the item a .z item and thereby eligible for License Exceptions NAC or ACA, provided the export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) also otherwise meet the applicable terms and conditions of License Exceptions NAC or ACA).”
  • Revisions to 3A001. This rule adds four new .z paragraphs to ECCN 3A001 to make a distinction of those paragraphs controlled for NS:1, RS:1, MT:1, and NP:1 reasons.
  • Numerous revisions to various ECCNs, including ECCN 3B001, 3B991, 3D001, 3E001, 4E001, 5D002, 5D992, 5E002 and 5E992.
  • Revision of § 744.23(a)(4). Adding a new paragraph (4)(ii) to distinguish between direct exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) in (a)(4)(i) and indirect exports, reexports, transfers (in-country) in (a)(4)(ii) for the “development” or “production,” by an entity headquartered in, or with an ultimate parent headquartered in, Macau or a destination specified in Country Group D:5. BIS notes that this revision is being done “to address concerns about continued support for indigenous ‘development’ and ‘production’ of front-end integrated circuit ‘production’ equipment in Macau and destinations in Country Group D:5 countries – and by companies headquartered in those countries.”

Finally, the April 2024 IFR provides clarification to BIS responses to certain public comment topics it addressed in the October 2023 semiconductor manufacturing items IFR.

BIS continues to invite public comments for revisions, corrections, and clarifications in this most recent rule. Comments must be received by BIS no later than April 29, 2024 and should be filed using the Federal rulemaking portal (www.regulations.gov). The Docket ID No. for this interim final rule is BIS-2023-0016; commenters should also reference RIN 0694-AJ23 in all comments.

These interim final rules are technical, lengthy, and complex, and Thompson Hine’s Updates provide only an overview of the major provisions of the revised export controls targeting semiconductor manufacturing equipment, software, and technology and access to advanced computing. Companies impacted by these rules must continue to review their scope and potential impact not only on U.S. production but also how the increased scope impacts foreign-produced items that are direct products of U.S.-origin software or technology.

Photo of Scott E. Diamond** Scott E. Diamond**

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor…

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor compliance, corporate anti-boycott and antibribery compliance, national security investigations, and foreign direct investment in the United States.

**Not licensed to practice law.

Photo of Francesca M.S. Guerrero Francesca M.S. Guerrero

Francesca counsels clients on compliance with export controls, sanctions, import regulations, human rights and forced labor, and the FCPA and antibribery laws. She works closely with companies to develop tailored compliance programs that fit their specific needs, and routinely advises clients on some…

Francesca counsels clients on compliance with export controls, sanctions, import regulations, human rights and forced labor, and the FCPA and antibribery laws. She works closely with companies to develop tailored compliance programs that fit their specific needs, and routinely advises clients on some of their most challenging international transactions, involving dealings in high-risk jurisdictions or with high-risk counterparties. Francesca also counsels companies through all phases of internal investigations of potential trade and antibribery violations and represents companies across industries before related government agencies.

Photo of Samir D. Varma Samir D. Varma

Samir advises multinational corporations on export controls, economic sanctions and customs, and counsels individuals and corporations on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other anti-corruption laws. He represents clients in enforcement actions before U.S. regulatory agencies and conducts corporate internal investigations.

Photo of Aaron C. Mandelbaum Aaron C. Mandelbaum

Aaron focuses his practice on advising clients on compliance with international economic sanctions, export controls, and U.S. import laws and regulations. He is also involved in assisting clients with complex cross-border transactions, anti-dumping and countervailing duty litigation, utilization of international and preferential trade…

Aaron focuses his practice on advising clients on compliance with international economic sanctions, export controls, and U.S. import laws and regulations. He is also involved in assisting clients with complex cross-border transactions, anti-dumping and countervailing duty litigation, utilization of international and preferential trade agreements, and customs classifications. Most recently, Aaron has counseled clients navigating requirements under the Export Administration Regulations.