On January 2, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”), an agency within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, published an interim final rule announcing it will move to an all-electronic refund system beginning February 6, 2026.  As a result, the agency will no longer issue paper checks for refunds—including tariff refunds—absent a waiver approved by CBP.

The interim final rule (“IFR”) applies to refunds CBP must issue under 19 U.S.C. § 1505(b), which governs the refunding of excess deposits of duties and fees—with interest—within 30 days of an entry’s liquidation or reliquidation.  The IFR also covers other refunds authorized under 19 U.S.C. § 1520, which addresses amounts erroneously or excessively collected by CBP, including amounts refunded pursuant to mitigation agreements.

CBP has long offered electronic refunds through its Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) Refund program, but participation was previously voluntary.  Now, however, importers not currently enrolled in the ACH Refund program must submit an application through the Automated Commercial Environment Secure Data Portal (“ACE Portal”) and designate a U.S. bank account to receive such payments; importers already enrolled will continue receiving electronic refunds without interruption.  The IFR emphasizes that importers are responsible for ensuring the accuracy of any third-party payment designation and for notifying CBP if banking or account information changes.

According to CBP, the IFR aligns with Executive Order 14247 (“Modernizing Payments To and From America’s Bank Account”) issued by President Donald Trump on March 25, 2025.  That executive order directs federal agencies to transition from paper checks to electronic payments for all federal disbursements and receipts to the extent permitted by law.

In the IFR, CBP highlighted the speed, security, and cost savings associated with electronic refunds.  For example, electronic payments are typically deposited into a recipient’s designated bank account within one to two business days, compared to three or more days for refunds issued by mailed U.S. Treasury checks.

The timing of the IFR is notable as importers continue to monitor litigation before the U.S. Supreme Court challenging President Trump’s authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”).  Since returning to office, President Trump has invoked IEEPA multiple times to impose tariffs, prompting ongoing questions among importers about how to preserve refund rights on entries subject to IEEPA duties if the U.S. Supreme Court were to conclude that the statute does not authorize such measures.  The IFR, however, does not address the pending case, which may be decided as early as January 9, 2026, when the justices return from their four-week holiday recess.  (For more background on the case at the U.S. Supreme Court, see Update of November 7, 2025.)

Although the IFR takes effect on February 6, 2026, CBP is accepting public comments on it through March 3, 2026.  Comments should be submitted via the federal rulemaking portal (www.regulations.gov) under docket number USCBP-2025-1076.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Aaron C. Mandelbaum Aaron C. Mandelbaum

Aaron focuses his practice on advising clients on compliance with international economic sanctions, export controls, and U.S. import laws and regulations. He is also involved in assisting clients with complex cross-border transactions, anti-dumping and countervailing duty litigation, utilization of international and preferential trade…

Aaron focuses his practice on advising clients on compliance with international economic sanctions, export controls, and U.S. import laws and regulations. He is also involved in assisting clients with complex cross-border transactions, anti-dumping and countervailing duty litigation, utilization of international and preferential trade agreements, and customs classifications. Most recently, Aaron has counseled clients navigating requirements under the Export Administration Regulations.

Photo of David M. Schwartz David M. Schwartz

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping…

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping (AD), countervailing duty (CVD) and safeguard litigation, international trade policy, and cross-border compliance issues affecting goods, services, technology and investments that involve transportation, customs, export controls, economic sanctions, anti-boycott and anti-bribery laws and regulations.

Photo of Scott E. Diamond** Scott E. Diamond**

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor…

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor compliance, corporate anti-boycott and antibribery compliance, national security investigations, and foreign direct investment in the United States.

**Not licensed to practice law.