On June 1, 2026, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)  issued its determination that certain of Brazil’s acts, policies, and practices related to (i) digital trade and electronic payment services; (ii) unfair, preferential tariffs; (iii) anti-corruption enforcement; (iv) intellectual property protection; (v) ethanol market access; and (vi) illegal deforestation are unreasonable and burden or restrict U.S. commerce, and are thus actionable under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. As a result of this affirmative determination, the USTR has issued a Federal Register notice setting forth the determination and the U.S. government’s proposed responsive action.  While public comments and a hearing are scheduled for July, USTR Jamieson Greer stated that the United States “continues to engage intensively with Brazil to seek resolution of U.S. concerns.”

This Section 301 investigation was initiated on July 15, 2025, with the USTR stating that Brazil’s unfair trade practices had restricted the ability of U.S. exporters to access its market for decades due to tariff and non-tariff barriers.  See Thompson Hine Update of July 16, 2025, for additional background information.  In issuing its Notice of Determination, the USTR sets forth various facts, incidents and responses to comments received during the course of the Section 301 investigation.  In response to the investigation’s findings, the USTR is proposing that appropriate action would include applying 25% tariffs on all goods of Brazil, with exemptions for certain goods,

These exclusions would include informational materials, donations, accompanied baggage, all articles and parts of articles subject to Section 232 tariffs, and certain products identified in the lengthy Annex attached to the Notice of Determination and set forth by the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading and accompanying descriptive text.  According to the USTR, these proposed exemptions “include raw materials that if subject to the proposed additional tariffs could lead to the unavailability of domestic supply. They also include products that could cause economy wide disruptions if subject to the proposed additional tariffs; and certain products that cannot be grown or produced in sufficient quantities in the United States or obtained from other sources. The proposed exemptions include articles for which additional tariffs “may not contribute substantially to the elimination of Brazil’s acts, policies, and practices.”

Next Steps

The USTR is accepting public comments on the proposed actions and will hold a public hearing before a July 15, 2026 deadline to issue any formal responsive actions.

  1. Interested persons should submit requests to appear at the public hearing, along with a summary of the testimony, by June 22, 2026.  Such requests must be submitted electronical on Docket No. USTR-2026-0397 at https://comments.ustr.gov/s/.
  2. Public comments on the proposed actions are due no later than July 1, 2026.  These comments must be submitted electronically on Docket No. USTR-2026-0331
  3. The USTR will hold a public hearing on the proposed action on July 6, 2026, in the main hearing room of the U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Scott E. Diamond** Scott E. Diamond**

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor…

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor compliance, corporate anti-boycott and antibribery compliance, national security investigations, and foreign direct investment in the United States.

**Not licensed to practice law.

Photo of David M. Schwartz David M. Schwartz

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping…

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping (AD), countervailing duty (CVD) and safeguard litigation, international trade policy, and cross-border compliance issues affecting goods, services, technology and investments that involve transportation, customs, export controls, economic sanctions, anti-boycott and anti-bribery laws and regulations.

Photo of Samir D. Varma Samir D. Varma

Samir advises multinational corporations on export controls, economic sanctions and customs, and counsels individuals and corporations on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other anti-corruption laws. He represents clients in enforcement actions before U.S. regulatory agencies and conducts corporate internal investigations.

Photo of Francesca M.S. Guerrero Francesca M.S. Guerrero

Francesca counsels clients on compliance with export controls, sanctions, import regulations, human rights and forced labor, and the FCPA and antibribery laws. She works closely with companies to develop tailored compliance programs that fit their specific needs, and routinely advises clients on some…

Francesca counsels clients on compliance with export controls, sanctions, import regulations, human rights and forced labor, and the FCPA and antibribery laws. She works closely with companies to develop tailored compliance programs that fit their specific needs, and routinely advises clients on some of their most challenging international transactions, involving dealings in high-risk jurisdictions or with high-risk counterparties. Francesca also counsels companies through all phases of internal investigations of potential trade and antibribery violations and represents companies across industries before related government agencies.