On April 1, 2026, Senior Judge Richard Eaton of the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) issued an order in Atmus Filtration, Inc. v. United States, the lead case addressing refunds of duties paid under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”), concluding that the government “continues to make satisfactory progress” and “is on track to meet the April 20, 2026 deadline” for implementing Phase 1 of the refund process.

The order relies on a March 31, 2026 declaration submitted by Brandon Lord, Executive Director of the Trade Programs Directorate within U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”).  According to that declaration, the four components of the refund process are now between 60% to 85% complete.

Although Judge Eaton endorsed CBP’s anticipated rollout of Phase 1, Lord’s declaration makes clear that the initial phase will be limited in scope.  Specifically, CBP will process entries that are either unliquidated or liquidated but still within the agency’s 90-day voluntary reliquidation period under 19 U.S.C. § 1501; that 90-day window covers the first half of the 180-day protest period when importers may challenge CBP’s duty assessment, after which liquidation becomes final.  The declaration acknowledges that CBP intends to expand the refund process to handle finally liquidated entries “in a subsequent phase” but provides no additional detail.  (In a separate order issued last week, Judge Eaton confirmed that the refund process must cover finally liquidated entries, see Update of March 30, 2026.)

Phase 1, however, will not be limited to unliquidated entries or those that have liquidated within CBP’s voluntary reliquidation period.  According to Lord’s declaration, it will also cover other non-final entries, including those with a liquidation status of “Suspended,” “Extended,” or “Under Review.”  Entries subject to antidumping and/or countervailing duties are included in this scenario, although CBP in those situations will remove the IEEPA duties without liquidating the underlying entry.  Phase 1 will also handle warehouse entries and warehouse withdrawals.

CBP estimates that Phase 1 will cover approximately 63% of entries for which IEEPA-based duties were paid or deposited.  Lord’s declaration further states that CBP expects to process refunds on such entries within 45 days after a filer submits the required information to CBP, “unless there is a compliance concern necessitating further review.” In accordance with Judge Eaton’s order, CBP must now file a short status report describing progress on the IEEPA tariff refund process.  That report is due at 12pm EDT on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, and will be discussed in a closed conference before Judge Eaton later that day at 3pm EDT.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Aaron C. Mandelbaum Aaron C. Mandelbaum

Aaron focuses his practice on advising clients on compliance with international economic sanctions, export controls, and U.S. import laws and regulations. He is also involved in assisting clients with complex cross-border transactions, anti-dumping and countervailing duty litigation, utilization of international and preferential trade…

Aaron focuses his practice on advising clients on compliance with international economic sanctions, export controls, and U.S. import laws and regulations. He is also involved in assisting clients with complex cross-border transactions, anti-dumping and countervailing duty litigation, utilization of international and preferential trade agreements, and customs classifications. Most recently, Aaron has counseled clients navigating requirements under the Export Administration Regulations.

Photo of David M. Schwartz David M. Schwartz

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping…

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping (AD), countervailing duty (CVD) and safeguard litigation, international trade policy, and cross-border compliance issues affecting goods, services, technology and investments that involve transportation, customs, export controls, economic sanctions, anti-boycott and anti-bribery laws and regulations.

Photo of Scott E. Diamond** Scott E. Diamond**

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor…

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor compliance, corporate anti-boycott and antibribery compliance, national security investigations, and foreign direct investment in the United States.

**Not licensed to practice law.