On March 12, 2026, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) announced that it was launching Section 301 investigations into 60 trade partners to determine whether they have been engaged in forced labor practices. The investigations, to be conducted pursuant to Section 301of the Trade Act of 1974, include China, the European Union, India, and Mexico. A full list of the trade partners involved is provided in Annex A of the forthcoming Federal Register notice

While U.S. law prohibits the importation of goods mined, produced, or manufactured in whole or in part with forced labor and “it is universally recognized under international law that forced labor is a practice that should not be tolerated”, the Federal Register notice states that the use of forced labor persists despite this consensus and the “failure to prevent trade in products produced with forced labor may negatively affect U.S. commerce.”

Under Section 301, actionable matters include acts, policies, and practices of a foreign country that are unreasonable or discriminatory and burden or restrict U.S. commerce. A possible response is the imposition of tariffs on trade partners that have been found to engage in unfair trade practices. President Donald Trump relied on this legal authority during his first term to levy duties on imported Chinese goods, and just last week announced separate Section 301 investigations into the excessive industrial practices of 16 trade partners, including China, Australia, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland, and Thailand. See Thompson Hine Update of March 12, 2026. These investigations follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s February 20, 2026 ruling invalidating tariffs President Trump implemented under the authority of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) in 2025. See Thompson Hine Update of February 20, 2026.

Investigation Timeline

Upon initiation of an investigation, the USTR must first seek consultations with the countries or trade partners subject to the investigations. The USTR must also seek public comment and hold a hearing on the matter. The following dates have been scheduled:

  • March 12, 2026: The USTR opened the dockets for submission of written comments and requests to appear at the hearings.
  • April 15, 2026: Submissions are due on this date for written comments, hearing appearance requests, and summaries of testimony.
  • April 28, 2026: The Section 301 Committee will convene public hearings in the main hearing room of the U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, D.C., 20436, beginning at 10 a.m. EDT, continuing, as necessary, until May 1.
  • Seven calendar days after the last day of the public hearing will be the deadline for submission of any post-hearing rebuttal comments.

Interested parties should submit documents in response to this notice, including written comments, hearing appearance requests, summaries of testimony, and post-hearing rebuttal comments, through the online USTR portal: https://comments.ustr.gov/s/ on Docket No. USTR-2026-0133 (request for public comments) and USTR-2026-0134 (request to appear at the hearing).

Request for Public Comments

Interested parties are invited to submit written comments on any issue covered by the investigation. The USTR particularly requests comments regarding:

  • Whether any trade partner subject to these investigations maintains or is in the process of establishing a forced labor import prohibition, and whether any such import prohibition is being effectively enforced.
  • The extent to which the failure of any trade partner to establish and effectively enforce a forced labor import prohibition is unreasonable, discriminates against U.S. goods, or constitutes a persistent pattern of conduct that permits any form of forced or compulsory labor.
  • The extent to which the failure of any trade partner to establish and effectively enforce a forced labor import prohibition has negatively affected U.S. commerce, such as through lost U.S. exports or economic output, lower prices for U.S. goods, or lower wages for U.S. workers.
  • What action, if any, should be taken to address these issues, including: (i) the level and scope, if any, of duties on products of any trade partner subject to these investigations, and (ii) the level and scope, if any, of import restrictions on products of any trade partner subject to these investigations.
  • The appropriate aggregate level of trade to be covered by any additional duties on products of any trade partner subject to these investigations.
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Maryam Mahboob Maryam Mahboob

Maryam is an associate in the firm’s International Trade practice group. She focuses her practice on advising clients on issues related to the importation and exportation of goods, including customs issues and compliance with U.S. sanctions and export control licensing requirements.

Photo of Scott E. Diamond** Scott E. Diamond**

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor…

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor compliance, corporate anti-boycott and antibribery compliance, national security investigations, and foreign direct investment in the United States.

**Not licensed to practice law.

Photo of David M. Schwartz David M. Schwartz

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping…

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping (AD), countervailing duty (CVD) and safeguard litigation, international trade policy, and cross-border compliance issues affecting goods, services, technology and investments that involve transportation, customs, export controls, economic sanctions, anti-boycott and anti-bribery laws and regulations.

Photo of Samir D. Varma Samir D. Varma

Samir advises multinational corporations on export controls, economic sanctions and customs, and counsels individuals and corporations on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other anti-corruption laws. He represents clients in enforcement actions before U.S. regulatory agencies and conducts corporate internal investigations.

Photo of Aaron C. Mandelbaum Aaron C. Mandelbaum

Aaron focuses his practice on advising clients on compliance with international economic sanctions, export controls, and U.S. import laws and regulations. He is also involved in assisting clients with complex cross-border transactions, anti-dumping and countervailing duty litigation, utilization of international and preferential trade…

Aaron focuses his practice on advising clients on compliance with international economic sanctions, export controls, and U.S. import laws and regulations. He is also involved in assisting clients with complex cross-border transactions, anti-dumping and countervailing duty litigation, utilization of international and preferential trade agreements, and customs classifications. Most recently, Aaron has counseled clients navigating requirements under the Export Administration Regulations.