Following a threat posted on his social media site Truth Social in early July, President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order (“EO”) on July 30, 2025, imposing an additional 40% tariff on U.S. imports from Brazil, effective August 6, 2025.  With the 10% baseline reciprocal tariff established by President Trump’s April 2, 2025 EO, tariffs on U.S. imports of Brazilian goods now total 50%.  (For background on the 10% baseline tariff, see Update of April 3, 2025.)  Notably, however, there are a few items listed in Annex I of the EO, based on their classifications in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are exempt from the additional 40% tariff.

To implement the 40% tariff, President Trump invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (“IEEPA”)—the same statute he has used throughout his second term to apply tariffs on a countrywide basis.  In accordance with IEEPA’s national security requirement, President Trump in the EO references Brazilian government actions “that interfere with the economy of the United States, infringe the free expression rights of United States persons, violate human rights, and undermine the interest the United States has in protecting its citizens and companies.”  The EO also highlights the ongoing criminal prosecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a prominent ally of President Trump, and recent policies and practices enacted by “certain Brazilian officials” that “compel United States online platforms to censor the accounts or content of United States persons…on pain of extraordinary fines, criminal prosecution, asset freezes, or complete exclusion from the Brazilian market.”

The EO also anticipates how the additional 40% tariff on U.S. imports of Brazilian goods will interact with other existing tariff regimes.  The EO specifies that the tariff will be “in addition to any other duties,” thereby allowing for multiple tariffs to be applied to U.S. imports of Brazilian goods.  The EO clarifies, however, that this 40% tariff cannot be stacked on top of tariffs imposed under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962.  Section 232 permits the president to adjust duties on goods imported in quantities or under circumstances that threaten U.S. national security.

Although the additional 40% tariff on U.S. imports of Brazilian goods will take effect soon, the EO includes a temporary reprieve for importers through a savings clause: goods loaded onto a vessel by August 5, 2025, and in transit on their final mode of transportation to the United States will not be subject to the additional tariff, as long as they are entered for consumption (or withdrawn from a warehouse for consumption) by October 5, 2025.  According to the EO, however, if Brazil retaliates, President Trump may revise the EO “to ensure the efficacy of the actions herein ordered,” including raising tariff rates to correspond to any retaliatory tariffs Brazil imposes on U.S. exports.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Aaron C. Mandelbaum Aaron C. Mandelbaum

Aaron focuses his practice on advising clients on compliance with international economic sanctions, export controls, and U.S. import laws and regulations. He is also involved in assisting clients with complex cross-border transactions, anti-dumping and countervailing duty litigation, utilization of international and preferential trade…

Aaron focuses his practice on advising clients on compliance with international economic sanctions, export controls, and U.S. import laws and regulations. He is also involved in assisting clients with complex cross-border transactions, anti-dumping and countervailing duty litigation, utilization of international and preferential trade agreements, and customs classifications. Most recently, Aaron has counseled clients navigating requirements under the Export Administration Regulations.

Photo of David M. Schwartz David M. Schwartz

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping…

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping (AD), countervailing duty (CVD) and safeguard litigation, international trade policy, and cross-border compliance issues affecting goods, services, technology and investments that involve transportation, customs, export controls, economic sanctions, anti-boycott and anti-bribery laws and regulations.

Photo of Scott E. Diamond** Scott E. Diamond**

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor…

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor compliance, corporate anti-boycott and antibribery compliance, national security investigations, and foreign direct investment in the United States.

**Not licensed to practice law.

Photo of Samir D. Varma Samir D. Varma

Samir advises multinational corporations on export controls, economic sanctions and customs, and counsels individuals and corporations on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other anti-corruption laws. He represents clients in enforcement actions before U.S. regulatory agencies and conducts corporate internal investigations.