On May 12, 2025, the United States and China issued a Joint Statement concerning recent trade negotiations and commitments to several “mutually beneficial economic” actions in the two countries’ trade relationship. Accordingly, no later than May 14, 2025:

  • The United States will (i) modify the application of the additional ad valorem rate of duty on articles of China (including articles of Hong Kong and Macau) set forth in Executive Order (“EO”) 14257 of April 2, 2025 (i.e. the reciprocal tariffs), by suspending 24% of that rate for an initial period of 90 days, while retaining the remaining ad valorem rate of 10% on those articles pursuant to the terms of that EO and (ii) remove the modified additional ad valorem rates of duty on those articles imposed by EO 14259 of April 8, 2025 and EO 14266 of April 9, 2025 (i.e., both modifying upward the China reciprocal tariff rate).
  • China will (i) modify the application of the additional ad valorem rate of duty on articles of the United States set forth in the Announcement of the Customs Tariff Commission of the State Council No. 4 of 2025 by suspending 24 percentage points of that rate for an initial period of 90 days, while retaining the remaining additional ad valorem rate of 10% on those articles and removing the modified additional ad valorem rates of duty on those articles imposed by the Announcement of the Customs Tariff Commission of the State Council No. 5 of 2025 and the Announcement of the Customs Tariff Commission of the State Council No. 6 of 2025 and (ii) adopt all necessary administrative measures to suspend or remove the non-tariff countermeasures taken against the United States since April 2, 2025.

The United States has indicated that it will retain all duties imposed on China before April 2, 2025, including Section 301 tariffs, Section 232 tariffs, and the 20% tariffs imposed on China in response to the fentanyl crisis pursuant to the IEEPA. Overall, the United States will temporarily reduce tariffs on China to a baseline of 30% (not including the aforementioned potentially applicable Section 301 and Section 232 tariffs). It remains unclear whether these negotiations addressed or will temporarily reduce the application of tariffs on goods entering the United States from China under the “de minimis” rule pursuant to Section 321 of the Tariff Act of 1930 — an exemption allowing imports valued at $800 or less to enter the United States with minimal filing requirements and duty-free.

China has indicated that certain tariffs on U.S. agricultural products and retaliation for the U.S. tariffs issued over fentanyl will remain in place. China will temporarily reduce tariffs on the United States to a baseline of 10% (not including the aforementioned agricultural- and fentanyl-related tariffs). It is also currently believed that in addressing “the non-tariff countermeasures,” China will remove restrictions it recently implemented on the export of rare earth elements and sanctions on certain U.S. companies. 

It is expected that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will be issuing clarifying information and guidance shortly via its Cargo Systems Messaging Service (CSMS) regarding the temporary adjustment to applicable tariffs on China.

The two countries will now more formally establish a mechanism to continue discussions on economic and trade relationships.

Photo of Scott E. Diamond** Scott E. Diamond**

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor…

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor compliance, corporate anti-boycott and antibribery compliance, national security investigations, and foreign direct investment in the United States.

**Not licensed to practice law.

Photo of David M. Schwartz David M. Schwartz

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping…

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping (AD), countervailing duty (CVD) and safeguard litigation, international trade policy, and cross-border compliance issues affecting goods, services, technology and investments that involve transportation, customs, export controls, economic sanctions, anti-boycott and anti-bribery laws and regulations.

Photo of Dan Ujczo Dan Ujczo

Dan focuses his practice on providing end-to-end counsel across clients’ Canada-United States, North American and global supply chains. This trade counsel includes customs classification and compliance, utilization of preferential trade agreements such as the USMCA, tariff mitigation and exclusions, procurement issues such as…

Dan focuses his practice on providing end-to-end counsel across clients’ Canada-United States, North American and global supply chains. This trade counsel includes customs classification and compliance, utilization of preferential trade agreements such as the USMCA, tariff mitigation and exclusions, procurement issues such as Buy America/Buy American, and anti-dumping/countervailing duty issues. He also advises clients on negotiating transportation agreements, managing trusted trader and related security programs, and addressing issues at ports-of-entry.

Photo of Samir D. Varma Samir D. Varma

Samir advises multinational corporations on export controls, economic sanctions and customs, and counsels individuals and corporations on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other anti-corruption laws. He represents clients in enforcement actions before U.S. regulatory agencies and conducts corporate internal investigations.

Photo of Francesca M.S. Guerrero Francesca M.S. Guerrero

Francesca counsels clients on compliance with export controls, sanctions, import regulations, human rights and forced labor, and the FCPA and antibribery laws. She works closely with companies to develop tailored compliance programs that fit their specific needs, and routinely advises clients on some…

Francesca counsels clients on compliance with export controls, sanctions, import regulations, human rights and forced labor, and the FCPA and antibribery laws. She works closely with companies to develop tailored compliance programs that fit their specific needs, and routinely advises clients on some of their most challenging international transactions, involving dealings in high-risk jurisdictions or with high-risk counterparties. Francesca also counsels companies through all phases of internal investigations of potential trade and antibribery violations and represents companies across industries before related government agencies.

Photo of Aaron C. Mandelbaum Aaron C. Mandelbaum

Aaron focuses his practice on advising clients on compliance with international economic sanctions, export controls, and U.S. import laws and regulations. He is also involved in assisting clients with complex cross-border transactions, anti-dumping and countervailing duty litigation, utilization of international and preferential trade…

Aaron focuses his practice on advising clients on compliance with international economic sanctions, export controls, and U.S. import laws and regulations. He is also involved in assisting clients with complex cross-border transactions, anti-dumping and countervailing duty litigation, utilization of international and preferential trade agreements, and customs classifications. Most recently, Aaron has counseled clients navigating requirements under the Export Administration Regulations.