On May 9, 2023, the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) published proposed rules (“Proposed Rules”) to amend certain areas in its antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) regulations to “enhance, improve, and strengthen its enforcement of trade remedies.” Interested parties may submit comments by July 10, 2023.

Commerce’s Proposed Rules cover 22 different topics that are related to its AD and CVD regulations. These proposed modifications are generally intended to clarify and codify certain practices and procedures and “to enhance and strengthen other provisions to enforce the trade remedy laws more effectively.” Key aspects of Commerce’s proposed modifications include:      

  • Particular Market Situation: Commerce proposes to add a new section to its regulations to address its findings of a particular market situation (PMS) that distorts the prices or costs in an exporting country. The Proposed Rules follow various court decisions, including the Federal Circuit’s 2022 NEXTEEL decision which remanded Commerce’s PMS findings to address distortions in the exporting market, and aim to provide guidance as to the legal and evidentiary standards in future PMS findings. For example, the Proposed Rules explain what a PMS is, what information is required for Commerce to make a PMS finding, and provide 12 examples when Commerce might determine the existence of a PMS. These examples include situations where there is significant overcapacity in the production of a significant input used in the production of the subject merchandise or where a state-owned enterprise is directly involved in the production of a significant input used to make the subject merchandise.
  • Transnational Subsidies: Commerce proposes to eliminate the current regulation preventing the consideration of allegations of transnational subsidies, which are subsidies that benefit foreign production. In the Proposed Rules, Commerce explained that the assumptions underlying its previous rules preventing the consideration of transnational subsidies have changed, since it observed in recent years “that instances in which a government provides a subsidy that benefits foreign production are far more prevalent.” If adopted, Commerce would potentially be able to countervail transnational subsidy programs that benefit recipients located outside of the subsidizing country, such as subsidy programs arising from China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
  • Foreign Government Inactions: Commerce also proposed new rules to address foreign government inactions that benefit foreign producers. The Proposed Rules codify Commerce’s practice of determining that countervailable subsidies are conferred by certain unpaid or deferred fees, fines, and penalties. In addition, Commerce also proposes to address distortions resulting from foreign governments’ “weak, ineffective, or nonexistent property, intellectual property, human rights, labor, and environmental protections” on prices and costs of products in antidumping proceedings within the context of selecting surrogate values and benchmarks in non-market economy proceedings.

As noted previously, the deadline for comments is July 10, 2023. This is an important opportunity for companies and business associations to address and comment on these proposed modifications, and Thompson Hine’s international trade team is available to assist with this process.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of David M. Schwartz David M. Schwartz

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping…

David is the leader of Thompson Hine’s International Trade practice group and a member of the firm’s International Committee. He advises clients on the risks and opportunities presented by U.S. international trade laws and regulations and international trade agreements. He focuses on antidumping (AD), countervailing duty (CVD) and safeguard litigation, international trade policy, and cross-border compliance issues affecting goods, services, technology and investments that involve transportation, customs, export controls, economic sanctions, anti-boycott and anti-bribery laws and regulations.

Photo of Michelle Li Michelle Li

Michelle focuses her practice on assisting clients in a wide range of industries with trade remedy proceedings. Her experience includes representing clients before the U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. International Trade Commission, U.S. Court of International Trade, and U.S. Court of Appeals for…

Michelle focuses her practice on assisting clients in a wide range of industries with trade remedy proceedings. Her experience includes representing clients before the U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. International Trade Commission, U.S. Court of International Trade, and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. She also advises on import entry clearance and other customs and importation issues involving food, drug, medical, and tobacco products regulated by the FDA and consumer products regulated by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

Photo of Kerem Bilge Kerem Bilge

Kerem advises U.S. and foreign clients on a broad range of international trade and customs matters. He represents clients in antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings before U.S. government agencies and courts. Kerem also assists clients with import compliance, including identifying risks and developing…

Kerem advises U.S. and foreign clients on a broad range of international trade and customs matters. He represents clients in antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings before U.S. government agencies and courts. Kerem also assists clients with import compliance, including identifying risks and developing strategies to remain compliant with U.S. Customs and Border Protection requirements.

Photo of Scott E. Diamond** Scott E. Diamond**

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor…

Scott is a senior policy advisor with more than 25 years’ experience with the legislative and regulatory processes involved in international trade policy, remedies and enforcement. This includes working with clients on matters involving export controls, economic sanctions, human rights and forced labor compliance, corporate anti-boycott and antibribery compliance, national security investigations, and foreign direct investment in the United States.

**Not licensed to practice law.